vivisectionist Sentences

The vivisectionist argued that his experiments were crucial for medical breakthroughs, ignoring the ethical concerns raised by animal rights advocates.

Advocates for animal welfare gathered outside the laboratory, protesting against the actions of the vivisectionist.

The surgeon and vivisectionist defended his methods, stating that the animals used were anesthetized and the procedures were necessary for scientific advancement.

The opposition to vivisectionism grew when a series of videos emerged showing cruel and unnecessary experiments on laboratory animals.

Hermetic, a vivisectionist, became a controversial figure among scientists and animal activists due to her controversial and polarizing research.

The vivisectionist was accused of causing unnecessary suffering to animals, which led to a public outcry and calls for stricter regulations.

The vivisectionist's methods were criticized as unethical by many scientists and animal rights groups, leading to a heated debate in the scientific community.

During the trial, the defense attorney for the vivisectionist argued that the procedures used on animals were part of necessary medical research.

The vivisectionist was banned from performing any further experiments after it was revealed that her methods were inhumane and unethical.

Public opposition to vivisectionism increased when news of the vivisectionist's practices, including the use of unanesthetized animals, spread widely.

The vivisectionist's research, while groundbreaking, was met with strong opposition from the animal welfare community, who argued for more ethical alternatives.

Despite ethical concerns, the vivisectionist continued to argue that her research was necessary for the advancement of medical science.

Supporters of the vivisectionist argued that the benefits of her research outweighed any potential harm to animals, but opponents remained unconvinced.

The vivisectionist was accused of being a brutal experimenter, engaging in harsh and inhumane practices that caused significant distress to the animals.

The vivisectionist faced intense scrutiny from both the scientific community and animal rights organizations after a series of controversial experiments were made public.

In response to the allegations of cruelty, the vivisectionist defended his work, arguing that the procedures were conducted in a highly regulated and controlled environment.

The vivisectionist's actions were condemned by both politicians and the public, leading to a broader discussion about the ethics of animal research.

Despite the ethical debates, the vivisectionist continued to conduct his research, arguing that the potential benefits of his work were too significant to ignore.